Snowflake offers a cloud data platform. Companies store large amounts of data there, analyze it and use it for artificial intelligence applications. Billing is mostly based on the computing power actually used. As of Oct 16, 2026
Snowflake runs a cloud platform on which companies combine data, analyze it, use it with artificial intelligence and share it. Customers pay by consumption, meaning only for the capacity actually used. The platform runs as a service on large public clouds in many regions of the world, so customers hardly need to maintain their own infrastructure. Customers can share data inside and outside their company, usually without copying it. Through the Snowflake Marketplace they also get access to data sets from external providers. Its offering includes products for analytics, data engineering, artificial intelligence as well as applications and collaboration.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Mar 20, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 17, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) No entry in the zone history yet (recording since Oct 12, 2026). Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Weekly candles (1W) Already existing when added to the recording (added in the Week from Oct 12, 2026) · Setup confirmed on Sep 8, 2026 · unchanged since it was added Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y complete (2 of 3 guidelines) · X = 31% of W; Y = 65% of W
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (Y).
Alternative (not drawn): Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (1 of 2 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W, Y can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed weekly candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 2 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices. Fibonacci measured logarithmically (weekly candles).
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 79% of W; Y = 101% of W
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (upward), Z complete (1 of 4 guidelines)
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 80% of W; Y = 101% of W
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 3 in progress (0 of 2 guidelines) · W2 = 81% of W1; W3 = 136% of W1
weak count Only a few guidelines met – the hard Elliott rules hold, but the count is still weak. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · Alternative: behind (1 of 2, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of Y, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of Y (+42.2% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: sharp countermove upward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of C (+42.2% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (1 of 4, weak) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of X
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of Z
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of X
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (0 of 2 guidelines, weak) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
weak count Only a few guidelines met – the hard Elliott rules hold, but the count is still weak. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
As long as the hourly close stays above the start of wave 1, this applies: Upward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 3 in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the start of wave 1
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Snowflake · Sector Technology · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect our buy zones, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Mar 20, 2026.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
Fiscal year 2026 (Feb 1, 2025 – Jan 31, 2026): Revenue 4.7B USD · Net income −1.3B USD · Net margin −28.4%
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 97 symbols in the Technology sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+51.2% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.5% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 51.2% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.5%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
– per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.3% (62 symbols)
per share: not computable (loss in the first or last year)
What does this mean? There was a loss in the first or last year. An annual growth rate cannot be calculated meaningfully then.
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
−28.4% last fiscal year
Sector Technology: median 12.5% (97 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue there was no profit but a loss of 28.43 USD. Five years ago the margin was −91.1%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
– latest balance sheet
Sector Technology: median 0.46 (65 symbols)
What does this mean? No usable figure: reported financial debt or positive equity for the same balance sheet date is missing.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
– Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Technology: median 30% (36 symbols)
What does this mean? The loaded SEC filings of the last two fiscal years contain no dividend per share. Either the company pays none, or it reports it under a different tag.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
0 of 8 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 0 of the last 8 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. 8 years ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jan 31, 2026 | 4.7B | −1.3B | −28.4% | −3.95 | – | – |
| 2025 | Jan 31, 2025 | 3.6B | −1.3B | −35.5% | −3.86 | – | – |
| 2024 | Jan 31, 2024 | 2.8B | −836.1M | −29.8% | −2.55 | – | – |
| 2023 | Jan 31, 2023 | 2.1B | −796.7M | −38.6% | −2.50 | – | – |
| 2022 | Jan 31, 2022 | 1.2B | −679.9M | −55.8% | −2.26 | – | – |
| 2021 | Jan 31, 2021 | 592.0M | −539.1M | −91.1% | −3.81 | – | – |
| 2020 | Jan 31, 2020 | 264.7M | −348.5M | −131.6% | −7.77 | – | – |
| 2019 | Jan 31, 2019 | 96.7M | −178.0M | −184.2% | – | – | – |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3/26 | Jul 31, 2026 | 1.5B | −191.7M | −12.4% | −0.55 | – | – |
| Q2/26 | Apr 30, 2026 | 1.4B | −295.6M | −21.2% | −0.86 | – | – |
| Q1/26* | Jan 31, 2026 | 1.3B | −309.6M | −24.1% | – | – | – |
| Q4/25 | Oct 31, 2025 | 1.2B | −294.0M | −24.2% | −0.87 | – | – |
| Q3/25 | Jul 31, 2025 | 1.1B | −298.0M | −26.0% | −0.89 | – | – |
| Q2/25 | Apr 30, 2025 | 1.0B | −430.1M | −41.3% | −1.29 | – | – |
| Q1/25* | Jan 31, 2025 | 986.8M | −327.5M | −33.2% | – | – | – |
| Q4/24 | Oct 31, 2024 | 942.1M | −324.3M | −34.4% | −0.98 | – | – |
| Q3/24 | Jul 31, 2024 | 868.8M | −316.9M | −36.5% | −0.95 | – | – |
| Q2/24 | Apr 30, 2024 | 828.7M | −317.0M | −38.3% | −0.95 | – | – |
| Q1/24* | Jan 31, 2024 | 774.7M | −169.4M | −21.9% | – | – | – |
| Q4/23 | Oct 31, 2023 | 734.2M | −214.3M | −29.2% | −0.65 | – | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $521.6M8 people | −$521.6M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $1.1B9 people | −$1.1B |
| 12 months | $00 people | $1.3B9 people | −$1.3B |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
No recent news found. News are loaded automatically three times a day for trending stocks, symbols with a buy zone and favorites.
No posts on SNOW yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules