Micron Technology is a major US maker of memory chips. The company produces DRAM memory, including HBM memory for AI computers, and NAND flash for SSDs, smartphones and cars. Its plants are in the US, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore. As of Oct 12, 2026
The company makes semiconductor memory, mainly DRAM, NAND and NOR, for applications from the cloud to end devices. Manufacturing takes place in its own plants and, for individual process steps, also at subcontractors. It offers components, modules, SSDs, managed NAND, multi-chip packages and wafers. The CMBU unit supplies large cloud operators with memory and data centers with HBM, as well as DDR, LPDDR and GDDR. The CDBU unit supplies SSDs and NAND for data centers as well as memory for device makers, enterprises and NeoCloud, meaning AI-focused cloud providers. The MCBU unit serves mobile devices and PCs, and the AEBU unit cars, industry and consumer products.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Oct 9, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) No active buy zone – the last one ended on Oct 16, 2026 · Buy zone no longer valid Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) Zone valid since the Week from Oct 12, 2026 · last changed in the Week from Oct 19, 2026 Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Flat (running), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (3 of 3 guidelines) · B = 138% of A; C = 106% of A
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (C).
Note: Running flat: rare, only in strong trends.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B, C can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed weekly candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 2 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices. Fibonacci measured logarithmically (weekly candles).
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Flat (running), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (3 of 3 guidelines) · B = 129% of A; C = 93% of A
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (C).
Note: Running flat: rare, only in strong trends.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B, C can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed daily candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 3 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Nested combination, Corrective pattern (downward), Y complete (2 of 3 guidelines) · X = 80% of W; Y = 248% of W
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Nested: leg Y is itself a combination, its X is 32.0% (at most 88.7%).
Note: Structure open: leg W, X cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Flat (type known only after C), Corrective pattern (upward), C in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · B = 112% of A; C = 118% of A
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y complete (1 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Flat type (regular, expanded, running) can only be decided once C is complete.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of C, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, running), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of C (+28.6% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of C, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, running), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of C (+26.1% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: W, X.
As long as the 4-hour close stays above the end of Y, this applies: complex countermove downward (Nested combination), Y complete – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is below the end of Y
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (1 of 3, weak) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays above the end of B, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, type known only after C), C in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of B
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of Y
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Micron Technology · Sector Technology · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Oct 9, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Sep 3, 2026
80.7% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 92 of 100: higher than 92% of 153 peers (All). strong.
Rank 96 of 100: higher than 96% of 57 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 56.1%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
74.6% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 99 of 100: higher than 99% of 192 peers (All). strong.
Rank 99 of 100: higher than 99% of 60 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 14.2%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
63.8% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 99 of 100: higher than 99% of 237 peers (All). strong.
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 12.5%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
61.4% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 91 of 100: higher than 91% of 218 peers (All). strong.
Rank 86 of 100: higher than 86% of 61 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 13.5%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
43.4% Fiscal year 2026 (total assets at year end)
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 238 peers (All). strong.
Rank 94 of 100: higher than 94% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 5.9%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
70.6% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 239 peers (All). strong.
Rank 85 of 100: higher than 85% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 51.6%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
44.3% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 96 of 100: higher than 96% of 213 peers (All). strong.
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 62 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 19.0%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
59.0B USD Fiscal year 2026
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+104.6% per year
Rank 96 of 100: higher than 96% of 230 peers (All). strong.
Rank 91 of 100: higher than 91% of 59 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +14.3%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+36.9% per year
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 217 peers (All). strong.
Rank 77 of 100: higher than 77% of 54 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +14.5%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+26.8% per year
Rank 92 of 100: higher than 92% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 85 of 100: higher than 85% of 37 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +12.4%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
+70.6% per year
Rank 96 of 100: higher than 96% of 146 peers (All). strong.
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +17.0%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
1% Fiscal year 2026
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+39.6% per year
Rank 94 of 100: higher than 94% of 118 peers (All). strong.
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +11.2%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
97.3x Fiscal year 2026
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
8 of 9 Fiscal year 2026
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 134 peers (All). strong.
Rank 92 of 100: higher than 92% of 44 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.03 at fiscal year end
Rank 93 of 100: lower than 93% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: lower than 88% of 54 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 0.41
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
3.31 at fiscal year end
Rank 84 of 100: higher than 84% of 215 peers (All). strong.
Rank 77 of 100: higher than 77% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 2.02
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
+0.2% in 5 years
Rank 41 of 100: lower than 41% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 58 of 100: lower than 58% of 51 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +2.8%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2026 (Aug 29, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026): Revenue 133.2B USD · Net income 85.0B USD · Net margin 63.8%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 80.7 USD gross profit, 74.6 USD operating income and 63.8 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 133.2B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 107.5B USD | 80.7% |
| Cost of revenue | 25.7B USD | 19.3% |
| Operating income | 99.3B USD | 74.6% |
| Research & development | 5.7B USD | 4.2% |
| Other operating expenses | 2.5B USD | 1.9% |
| Net income | 85.0B USD | 63.8% |
| Interest expense | 106.0M USD | 0.1% |
| Taxes & other (net) | 14.3B USD | 10.7% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from 22.7% to 74.6%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 13.3% to 61.4%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio fell in 5 years from 74.7% to 70.6%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio rose in 5 years from 3.10 to 3.31.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from 2.4B USD to 59.0B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count stayed roughly the same in 5 years.
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 0.10 USD to 0.53 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio fell in 5 years from 1.9% to 0.7%.
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 6.4B USD went back to shareholders, 59% of it through share repurchases.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Micron Technology next to 8 stocks of the sector Technology we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT Microsoft | 331.8B USD | +14.6% | 67.9% | 46.8% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 58.3% | 20.2% | 6/9 |
| NVDA Nvidia | 215.9B USD | +66.9% | 71.1% | 60.4% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 76.1% | 44.8% | 4/9 |
| MU Micron Technology this stock | 133.2B USD | +36.9% | 80.7% | 74.6% | 63.8% | 61.4% | 70.6% | 44.3% | 8/9 |
| DELL Dell Technologies | 113.5B USD | +3.8% | 20.0% | 7.2% | 5.2% | – | −2.4% | 7.5% | 7/9 |
| ACN Accenture | 74.2B USD | +8.0% | 32.0% | 15.4% | 11.3% | 26.5% | 42.9% | 15.7% | 6/9 |
| IBM IBM | 67.5B USD | −1.7% | 58.2% | – | 15.7% | 32.4% | 21.5% | 17.9% | 7/9 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 67.4B USD | +10.7% | – | 30.6% | 25.4% | 40.2% | 16.2% | −35.2% | – |
| AVGO Broadcom | 63.9B USD | +21.7% | 67.8% | 39.9% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 47.5% | 42.1% | – |
| CSCO Cisco | 63.3B USD | +4.9% | 64.5% | 24.3% | 21.0% | 26.4% | 38.8% | 20.2% | 7/9 |
| Median of the sector 63 symbols | 11.0B USD | +14.5% | 56.1% | 14.2% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 51.6% | 19.0% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 97 symbols in the Technology sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+36.9% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.5% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 36.9% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.5%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+70.7% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.3% (62 symbols)
per share: +70.6% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 70.7% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.3%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
63.8% last fiscal year
Sector Technology: median 12.5% (97 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 63.80 USD remained as profit – at least as much as the median company in the sector (12.5%). Five years ago the margin was 21.2%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.02 latest balance sheet
Sector Technology: median 0.45 (79 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.02 USD of financial debt – no more than the median company in the sector (0.45). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
1% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Technology: median 30% (36 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.01 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. The rest stays in the company. Median company in the sector: 30%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
9 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 9 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. One year ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 | 133.2B | 85.0B | 63.8% | 74.33 | 0.53 | 1% |
| 2025 | Aug 28, 2025 | 37.4B | 8.5B | 22.8% | 7.59 | 0.46 | 6% |
| 2024 | Aug 29, 2024 | 25.1B | 778.0M | 3.1% | 0.70 | 0.46 | 66% |
| 2023 | Aug 31, 2023 | 15.5B | −5.8B | −37.5% | −5.34 | 0.46 | – |
| 2022 | Sep 1, 2022 | 30.8B | 8.7B | 28.2% | 7.75 | 0.32 | 4% |
| 2021 | Sep 2, 2021 | 27.7B | 5.9B | 21.2% | 5.14 | 0.10 | 2% |
| 2020 | Sep 3, 2020 | 21.4B | 2.7B | 12.5% | 2.37 | – | – |
| 2019 | Aug 29, 2019 | 23.4B | 6.3B | 27.0% | 5.51 | – | – |
| 2018 | Aug 30, 2018 | 30.4B | 14.1B | 46.5% | 11.51 | – | – |
| 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | 20.3B | 5.1B | 25.0% | 4.41 | – | – |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3/26* | Sep 3, 2026 | 54.2B | 37.7B | 69.5% | – | 0.15 | – |
| Q2/26 | May 28, 2026 | 41.5B | 28.2B | 68.1% | 24.67 | 0.15 | 1% |
| Q1/26 | Feb 26, 2026 | 23.9B | 13.8B | 57.8% | 12.07 | 0.12 | 1% |
| Q4/25 | Nov 27, 2025 | 13.6B | 5.2B | 38.4% | 4.60 | 0.12 | 3% |
| Q3/25* | Aug 28, 2025 | 11.3B | 3.2B | 28.3% | – | 0.12 | – |
| Q2/25 | May 29, 2025 | 9.3B | 1.9B | 20.3% | 1.68 | 0.12 | 7% |
| Q1/25 | Feb 27, 2025 | 8.1B | 1.6B | 19.7% | 1.41 | 0.12 | 8% |
| Q4/24 | Nov 28, 2024 | 8.7B | 1.9B | 21.5% | 1.67 | 0.12 | 7% |
| Q3/24* | Aug 29, 2024 | 7.8B | 887.0M | 11.4% | – | 0.12 | – |
| Q2/24 | May 30, 2024 | 6.8B | 332.0M | 4.9% | 0.30 | 0.12 | 38% |
| Q1/24 | Feb 29, 2024 | 5.8B | 793.0M | 13.6% | 0.71 | 0.12 | 16% |
| Q4/23 | Nov 30, 2023 | 4.7B | −1.2B | −26.1% | −1.12 | 0.12 | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $84.3M4 people | −$84.3M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $279.3M9 people | −$279.3M |
| 12 months | $7.8M1 person | $375.0M12 people | −$367.2M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on MU yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules