Howmet Aerospace is a US aerospace supplier. The company makes cast turbine blades and other engine parts, specialty fasteners, forged wheels for trucks and structural components. It emerged in 2020 from the split of Arconic. As of Oct 11, 2026
Howmet Aerospace makes engine components, fasteners and structural parts for aerospace as well as forged aluminum wheels for commercial vehicles. Engine Products makes castings, turbine blades and seamless rolled rings mainly for aircraft engines and industrial gas turbines. Fastening Systems supplies fasteners for aerospace, industry and commercial vehicles, and Engineered Structures titanium products and forgings for aerospace and defense. Forged Wheels makes lightweight forged aluminum wheels for trucks, buses and trailers. Significant customers in 2025 were RTX and GE Aerospace. In April 2026 Howmet acquired Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing, until then a subsidiary of Stanley Black & Decker.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Feb 12, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · supplemented from filing (8-K) of Apr 6, 2026 (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 15, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y complete (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 59% of W; Y = 100% of W
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (upward), Z complete (2 of 4 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg X can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed weekly candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Nested combination, Corrective pattern (upward), Z complete (4 of 4 guidelines) · X = 78% of W; Y = 99% of W; X = 68% of Y; Z = 90% of W–Y
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Nested: leg Z is itself a combination, its X is 68.2% (at most 88.7%).
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg X can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Structure open: leg Y cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Count questionable: C in progress at 395% (C of A, limit 261.8%).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (2 of 3 guidelines) · X = 26% of W; Y = 79% of W
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (downward), Z in progress (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure open: leg X cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (downward), Wave 4 in progress (4 of 4 guidelines) · W2 = 63% of W1; W3 = 190% of W1
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y complete (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Alternation of W2 and W4 not checked.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W1, W3 can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 4, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of Y, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of Y
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of Z
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (4 of 4 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: Y.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of Z, this applies: complex countermove upward (Nested combination), Z complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of Z
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario and alternative: level (2 of 3 guidelines each, medium) – the simpler or clearer pattern counts as the main scenario. Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: X.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of X
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of the second X
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (4 of 4 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays below the end of wave 1, this applies: Downward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 4 in progress (pullback) – count then points to falling prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is above the end of wave 1
If that breaks, the alternative moves to the front: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to rising prices, as long as the hourly close stays above the end of Y.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of Y
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Howmet Aerospace · Sector Industrials · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Feb 12, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025
34.2% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 24 of 100: higher than 24% of 153 peers (All). weak.
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 22 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 35.4%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
24.8% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 68 of 100: higher than 68% of 192 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 28 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 10.4%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
18.3% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 62 of 100: higher than 62% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 78 of 100: higher than 78% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 12.9%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
28.2% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 70 of 100: higher than 70% of 218 peers (All). strong.
Rank 55 of 100: higher than 55% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 26.3%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
13.5% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 81 of 100: higher than 81% of 238 peers (All). strong.
Rank 84 of 100: higher than 84% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 7.5%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
47.9% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 67 of 100: higher than 67% of 239 peers (All). strong.
Rank 78 of 100: higher than 78% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 33.2%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
17.3% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 60 of 100: higher than 60% of 213 peers (All). medium.
Rank 83 of 100: higher than 83% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 10.5%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
1.4B USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+13.4% per year
Rank 66 of 100: higher than 66% of 230 peers (All). medium.
Rank 77 of 100: higher than 77% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +8.5%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+9.4% per year
Rank 44 of 100: higher than 44% of 217 peers (All). medium.
Rank 55 of 100: higher than 55% of 30 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +9.2%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+49.5% per year
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 23 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +10.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+50.5% per year
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 146 peers (All). strong.
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +13.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
12% Fiscal year 2025
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+85.6% per year
Rank 99 of 100: higher than 99% of 118 peers (All). strong.
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +7.7%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
8.0x Fiscal year 2025
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
8 of 9 Fiscal year 2025
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 134 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.57 at fiscal year end
Rank 52 of 100: lower than 52% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 55 of 100: lower than 55% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 0.62
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
2.13 at fiscal year end
Rank 71 of 100: higher than 71% of 215 peers (All). strong.
Rank 86 of 100: higher than 86% of 33 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 1.22
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
−7.5% in 5 years
Rank 73 of 100: lower than 73% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 74 of 100: lower than 74% of 29 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: −5.4%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2025 (Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025): Revenue 8.3B USD · Net income 1.5B USD · Net margin 18.3%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 34.2 USD gross profit, 24.8 USD operating income and 18.3 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 8.3B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 2.8B USD | 34.2% |
| Cost of revenue | 5.4B USD | 65.8% |
| Operating income | 2.0B USD | 24.8% |
| Research & development | 37.0M USD | 0.4% |
| Other operating expenses | 737.0M USD | 8.9% |
| Net income | 1.5B USD | 18.3% |
| Taxes | 332.0M USD | 4.0% |
| Interest & other | 206.0M USD | 2.5% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from 11.9% to 24.8%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 7.3% to 28.2%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio rose in 5 years from 31.3% to 47.9%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio fell in 5 years from 2.21 to 2.13.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 4 years from 250.0M USD to 1.4B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count fell in 5 years by 7.5% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 0.02 USD to 0.44 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio rose in 5 years from 4.2% to 11.9%.
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 2.7B USD went back to shareholders, 85% of it through share repurchases. That is 69% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USD Dividends partly reported as declared rather than paid.Dividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Howmet Aerospace next to 8 stocks of the sector Industrials we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH Parker Hannifin | 21.5B USD | +8.4% | 37.7% | 23.6% | 17.0% | 23.7% | 49.9% | 18.2% | 9/9 |
| TT Trane Technologies | 21.3B USD | +11.4% | – | 18.6% | 13.7% | 34.0% | 40.1% | 13.2% | – |
| EMR Emerson Electric | 18.0B USD | +1.4% | 52.8% | – | 12.7% | 11.3% | 48.3% | 14.8% | 6/9 |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works | 16.0B USD | +5.0% | 52.9% | 26.3% | 19.1% | 95.0% | 20.0% | 16.9% | 6/9 |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 14.1B USD | +5.9% | – | 32.1% | 20.5% | 22.0% | 30.1% | 12.1% | – |
| CTAS Cintas | 11.3B USD | +9.6% | 50.7% | 23.1% | 17.8% | 38.9% | 48.8% | 16.7% | 8/9 |
| VRT Vertiv | 10.2B USD | +18.5% | 36.3% | 17.9% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 32.3% | 18.5% | 6/9 |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace this stock | 8.3B USD | +9.4% | 34.2% | 24.8% | 18.3% | 28.2% | 47.9% | 17.3% | 8/9 |
| LYFT Lyft | 6.3B USD | +21.7% | – | −3.0% | 45.0% | 86.9% | 36.3% | – | – |
| Median of the sector 34 symbols | 24.1B USD | +9.2% | 35.4% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 26.3% | 33.2% | 9.7% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 90 symbols in the Industrials sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+9.4% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +8.0% (82 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 9.4% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+8.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+42.0% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +10.0% (66 symbols)
per share: +50.5% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 42.0% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+10.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
18.3% last fiscal year
Sector Industrials: median 11.1% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 18.27 USD remained as profit – at least as much as the median company in the sector (11.1%). Five years ago the margin was 5.0%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.71 latest balance sheet
Sector Industrials: median 0.58 (77 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.71 USD of financial debt – more than the median company in the sector (0.58). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
12% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Industrials: median 35% (65 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.12 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. The rest stays in the company. Median company in the sector: 35%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
8 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 8 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. 2 years ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 8.3B | 1.5B | 18.3% | 3.71 | 0.44 | 12% |
| 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 7.4B | 1.2B | 15.5% | 2.81 | 0.26 | 9% |
| 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 6.6B | 765.0M | 11.5% | 1.83 | 0.17 | 9% |
| 2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 5.7B | 469.0M | 8.3% | 1.11 | 0.10 | 9% |
| 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 5.0B | 258.0M | 5.2% | 0.59 | 0.04 | 7% |
| 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 5.3B | 261.0M | 5.0% | 0.48 | 0.02 | 4% |
| 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 14.2B | 470.0M | 3.3% | 1.03 | 0.12 | 12% |
| 2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 14.0B | 642.0M | 4.6% | 1.30 | 0.24 | 18% |
| 2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 13.0B | −74.0M | −0.6% | −0.28 | 0.24 | – |
| 2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 12.4B | −941.0M | −7.6% | −2.31 | 0.36 | – |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26 | Jun 30, 2026 | 2.5B | 534.0M | 21.0% | 1.33 | 0.12 | 9% |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 2.3B | 580.0M | 25.1% | 1.44 | 0.12 | 8% |
| Q4/25* | Dec 31, 2025 | 2.2B | 372.0M | 17.2% | – | 0.12 | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 2.1B | 385.0M | 18.4% | 0.95 | 0.24 | 25% |
| Q2/25 | Jun 30, 2025 | 2.1B | 407.0M | 19.8% | 1.00 | 0.10 | 10% |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 1.9B | 344.0M | 17.7% | 0.84 | 0.10 | 12% |
| Q4/24* | Dec 31, 2024 | 1.9B | 314.0M | 16.6% | – | 0.08 | – |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 1.8B | 332.0M | 18.1% | 0.81 | 0.16 | 20% |
| Q2/24 | Jun 30, 2024 | 1.9B | 266.0M | 14.1% | 0.65 | 0.05 | 8% |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 1.8B | 243.0M | 13.3% | 0.59 | 0.05 | 8% |
| Q4/23* | Dec 31, 2023 | 1.7B | 236.0M | 13.6% | – | 0.05 | – |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 1.7B | 188.0M | 11.3% | 0.45 | 0.09 | 20% |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $00 people | $0 |
| 6 months | $00 people | $11.3M1 person | −$11.3M |
| 12 months | $00 people | $22.9M2 people | −$22.9M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on HWM yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules