Corning is a US specialist in glass, ceramics and optical technology. It is known for Gorilla Glass, the protective glass for smartphones. Other areas are fiber optic cables for networks and data centers, display glass, emissions ceramics for cars and lab products. As of Oct 11, 2026
Based on glass and ceramics science and optical physics, Corning develops materials for communications, displays, consumer electronics, cars and life sciences. Optical Communications supplies optical fiber, cable and connectivity for telecommunications networks and data centers. The Display segment makes glass substrates for flat panel displays, used mainly in TVs, notebooks, monitors, tablets and handheld devices. Specialty Materials supplies chemically strengthened thin glass as cover glass for mobile phones, tablets, laptops and smartwatches as well as optics for the semiconductor industry. Automotive makes ceramic substrates and filters for emissions control and technical glass for vehicles. Life Sciences supplies lab products to researchers and drug makers.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Feb 12, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 26, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) No active buy zone – the last one ended on Oct 14, 2026 · Setup invalid (close below the start of wave 1) Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) Zone valid since the Week from Oct 19, 2026 · unchanged since then Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Double zigzag (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 87% of W; Y = 142% of W
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Alternative (not drawn): Triple zigzag (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (downward), Z in progress (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure open: leg X cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed weekly candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 2 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices. Fibonacci measured logarithmically (weekly candles).
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 26, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Flat (type known only after C), Corrective pattern (downward), C in progress (2 of 3 guidelines) · B = 98% of A; C = 169% of A
Note: Flat type (regular, expanded, running) can only be decided once C is complete.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (downward), Wave 3 in progress (1 of 3 guidelines) · W2 = 98% of W1; W3 = 169% of W1
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W2 can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Technical view: on this timeframe there is neither a buy zone of the rule nor an Elliott count that follows the rules. We calculate the lines automatically from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour) – for orientation, not a forecast, not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no value axis and no prices.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: X.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Double zigzag W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of X (+26.7% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Triple zigzag W-X-Y-X-Z), Z in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of the second X (+26.7% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 26, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of B, this applies: flat countermove downward in three waves (Flat, type known only after C), C in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of B
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 3 guidelines, weak) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the start of wave 1, this applies: Downward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 3 in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the start of wave 1
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the technical view in the analysis chart
Currently no wave count that follows the rules on hourly candles – so no scenarios. Technical view: Price below the 200-period average, Down trend line broken (close above it), a resistance lies above the price, last buy zone ended 13 days ago. Not a forecast, not investment advice.
Corning Inc. · Sector Technology · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Feb 12, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025
36.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 26 of 100: higher than 26% of 153 peers (All). weak.
Rank 18 of 100: higher than 18% of 57 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 56.1%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
14.6% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 192 peers (All). medium.
Rank 51 of 100: higher than 51% of 60 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 14.2%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
10.2% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 39 of 100: higher than 39% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 12.5%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
13.5% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 218 peers (All). medium.
Rank 50 of 100: higher than 50% of 61 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 13.5%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
5.2% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 46 of 100: higher than 46% of 238 peers (All). medium.
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 5.9%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
38.1% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 53 of 100: higher than 53% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 31 of 100: higher than 31% of 63 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 51.6%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
9.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 40 of 100: higher than 40% of 213 peers (All). medium.
Rank 38 of 100: higher than 38% of 62 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 19.0%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
1.4B USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+3.3% per year
Rank 27 of 100: higher than 27% of 230 peers (All). weak.
Rank 21 of 100: higher than 21% of 59 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +14.3%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+6.7% per year
Rank 27 of 100: higher than 27% of 217 peers (All). weak.
Rank 21 of 100: higher than 21% of 54 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +14.5%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+5.9% per year
Rank 33 of 100: higher than 33% of 157 peers (All). medium.
Rank 27 of 100: higher than 27% of 32 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +19.2%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+27.6% per year
Rank 79 of 100: higher than 79% of 146 peers (All). strong.
Rank 72 of 100: higher than 72% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +17.0%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+6.2% per year
Rank 34 of 100: higher than 34% of 140 peers (All). medium.
Rank 17 of 100: higher than 17% of 27 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +17.5%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
61% Fiscal year 2025
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+4.9% per year
Rank 22 of 100: higher than 22% of 118 peers (All). weak.
Rank 21 of 100: higher than 21% of 21 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +11.2%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
1.4x Fiscal year 2025
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
7 of 9 Fiscal year 2025
Rank 72 of 100: higher than 72% of 134 peers (All). strong.
Rank 70 of 100: higher than 70% of 44 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.65 at fiscal year end
Rank 49 of 100: lower than 49% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 40 of 100: lower than 40% of 54 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 0.41
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
1.59 at fiscal year end
Rank 58 of 100: higher than 58% of 215 peers (All). medium.
Rank 36 of 100: higher than 36% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 2.02
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
+12.8% in 5 years
Rank 25 of 100: lower than 25% of 199 peers (All). weak.
Rank 36 of 100: lower than 36% of 51 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +2.8%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2025 (Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025): Revenue 15.6B USD · Net income 1.6B USD · Net margin 10.2%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 36.0 USD gross profit, 14.6 USD operating income and 10.2 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 15.6B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 5.6B USD | 36.0% |
| Cost of revenue | 10.0B USD | 64.0% |
| Operating income | 2.3B USD | 14.6% |
| Research & development | 800.0M USD | 5.1% |
| Other operating expenses | 2.5B USD | 16.3% |
| Net income | 1.6B USD | 10.2% |
| Interest expense | 336.0M USD | 2.1% |
| Taxes | 310.0M USD | 2.0% |
| Other | 37.0M USD | 0.2% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from 4.5% to 14.6%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 3.9% to 13.5%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio fell in 5 years from 43.1% to 38.1%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio fell in 5 years from 2.12 to 1.59.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from 803.0M USD to 1.4B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count rose in 5 years by 12.8% – more new shares were issued than repurchased (dilution).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 0.88 USD to 1.12 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio fell in 5 years from 163.0% to 61.2%.
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow) Ratios above 500% hidden (earnings or free cash flow close to zero).Over 5 years, 5.5B USD went back to shareholders, 15% of it through share repurchases. That is 95% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USD Dividends partly reported as declared rather than paid.Dividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Corning Inc. next to 8 stocks of the sector Technology we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNDK Sandisk | 20.2B USD | – | 71.5% | 61.2% | 56.5% | 72.7% | 69.9% | 56.8% | 7/9 |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 17.7B USD | +4.1% | 57.0% | 34.1% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 47.1% | 14.7% | 6/9 |
| GLW Corning Inc. this stock | 15.6B USD | +6.7% | 36.0% | 14.6% | 10.2% | 13.5% | 38.1% | 9.0% | 7/9 |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 13.6B USD | +14.4% | 61.3% | – | 35.6% | 76.1% | 35.4% | 27.7% | 8/9 |
| NOW ServiceNow | 13.3B USD | +24.1% | 77.5% | 13.7% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 49.8% | 34.5% | 6/9 |
| WDC Western Digital | 12.9B USD | −5.3% | 48.9% | 34.5% | 72.9% | 106.3% | 63.9% | 27.2% | 7/9 |
| STX Seagate Technology | 12.2B USD | +2.7% | 45.6% | 33.6% | 26.1% | 146.9% | 21.7% | 25.5% | 8/9 |
| MSI Motorola Solutions | 11.7B USD | +9.5% | 51.7% | 25.6% | 18.4% | 89.4% | 12.4% | 22.0% | 6/9 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 11.5B USD | +22.0% | 70.4% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 56.7% | 35.8% | 4/9 |
| Median of the sector 63 symbols | 11.0B USD | +14.5% | 56.1% | 14.2% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 51.6% | 19.0% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 97 symbols in the Technology sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+6.7% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.5% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 6.7% per year on average, but more slowly than the median company in the sector (+13.5%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+25.5% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.3% (62 symbols)
per share: +27.6% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 25.5% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.3%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
10.2% last fiscal year
Sector Technology: median 12.5% (97 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 10.21 USD remained as profit – less than the median company in the sector (12.5%). Five years ago the margin was 4.5%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.62 latest balance sheet
Sector Technology: median 0.45 (79 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.62 USD of financial debt – more than the median company in the sector (0.45). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
61% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Technology: median 30% (36 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.61 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. Little buffer remains for weaker years. Median company in the sector: 30%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
9 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 9 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. One year ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 15.6B | 1.6B | 10.2% | 1.83 | 1.12 | 61% |
| 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 13.1B | 506.0M | 3.9% | 0.58 | 1.12 | 193% |
| 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 12.6B | 581.0M | 4.6% | 0.68 | 1.12 | 165% |
| 2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 14.2B | 1.3B | 9.3% | 1.54 | 1.08 | 70% |
| 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 14.1B | 1.9B | 13.5% | 1.28 | 0.96 | 75% |
| 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 11.3B | 512.0M | 4.5% | 0.54 | 0.88 | 163% |
| 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 11.5B | 960.0M | 8.3% | 1.07 | 0.80 | 75% |
| 2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 11.3B | 1.1B | 9.4% | 1.13 | 0.72 | 64% |
| 2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 10.1B | −497.0M | −4.9% | −0.66 | 0.62 | – |
| 2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 9.4B | 3.7B | 39.4% | 3.23 | 0.54 | 17% |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26 | Jun 30, 2026 | 4.5B | 559.0M | 12.4% | 0.64 | 0.56 | 88% |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 4.1B | 371.0M | 9.0% | 0.43 | 0.28 | 65% |
| Q4/25* | Dec 31, 2025 | 4.2B | 540.0M | 12.8% | – | – | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 4.1B | 430.0M | 10.5% | 0.50 | – | – |
| Q2/25 | Jun 30, 2025 | 3.9B | 469.0M | 12.1% | 0.54 | 0.56 | 104% |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 3.5B | 157.0M | 4.5% | 0.18 | 0.28 | 156% |
| Q4/24* | Dec 31, 2024 | 3.5B | 310.0M | 8.9% | – | – | – |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 3.4B | −117.0M | −3.5% | −0.14 | – | – |
| Q2/24 | Jun 30, 2024 | 3.3B | 104.0M | 3.2% | 0.12 | 0.56 | 467% |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 3.0B | 209.0M | 7.0% | 0.24 | 0.28 | 117% |
| Q4/23* | Dec 31, 2023 | 3.0B | −40.0M | −1.3% | – | – | – |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 3.2B | 164.0M | 5.2% | 0.19 | – | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $3.5M2 people | −$3.5M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $57.5M11 people | −$57.5M |
| 12 months | $00 people | $112.2M15 people | −$112.2M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on GLW yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules